Mutations

SORL1 E270K

Overview

Clinical Phenotype: Alzheimer's Disease
Position: (GRCh38/hg38):Chr11:121496918 G>A
Position: (GRCh37/hg19):Chr11:121367627 G>A
dbSNP ID: rs117260922
Coding/Non-Coding: Coding
DNA Change: Substitution
Expected Protein Consequence: Missense
Codon Change: GAA to AAA
Reference Isoform: SORL1 Isoform 1 (2214 aa)
Genomic Region: Exon 6

Findings

The E270K variant was detected in North American (Fernández et al., 2016; Sassi et al., 2016), European (Gómez-Tortosa et al., 2018; Sassi et al., 2016; Verheijen et al., 2016), Saudi Arabian (El Bitar et al., 2019), and Caribbean Hispanic (Vardarajan et al., 2015) cohorts. Although one study reported a nominal association of the variant with the risk of early onset AD in European Americans (Fernández et al., 2016), two other studies found no association with the risk of AD in European or North Americans cohorts (Sassi et al., 2016; Verheijen et al., 2016). A meta-analysis of five studies including more than 18,000 subjects of European or European American ancestry did not show an association between the E270K variant and AD (Campion et al., 2019), nor did a mega-analysis of multiple European and American datasets totaling nearly 32,000 subjects (Holstege et al., 2022). The lack of association persisted when the latter dataset was expanded to more than 40,000 subjects (Holstege et al., 2023).

In a Spanish family with four affected members in two generations, the E270K variant did not segregate with disease: Of the three family members for whom genotype data were available, one affected (age of onset 64 years) and one unaffected (age 77) sibling were heterozygous carriers of the variant, while another affected (age of onset 74 years) sibling was a noncarrier (Gómez-Tortosa et al., 2018). However, in a study of Caribbean-Hispanic families with a family history of AD, this variant was found to segregate with disease under a dominant affecteds-only model (Vardarajan et al., 2015).

This variant is classified “uncertain: most likely not pathogenic” by the criteria of Holstege et al. (Holstege et al., 2017; Gómez-Tortosa et al., 2018).

Functional Consequences

The biological effects of the E270K variant have been studied in HEK293 cells co-transfected with APP with the AD-linked Swedish mutation and either wild-type or mutant SORL1 (Vardarajan et al., 2015). The E270K variant resulted in increased levels of APP at the cell surface and increased secretion of Aβ40, Aβ42, sAPPα, and sAPPβ, compared with wild-type SORL1. The variant also showed reduced binding affinity to APP. Together these observations suggest that the E270K variant is less efficient than wild-type SORL1 at directing APP into the retromer-recycling endosome pathway.

Results consistent with the findings in HEK293 cells were seen in human neurons derived from iPSCs in which CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing was used to introduce the E270K mutation (Mishra et al., 2022). Levels of SORL1 protein were similar in neurons derived from the parental cell line and neurons heterozygous for the E270K variant. Neurons carrying the variant had enlarged early endosomes and increased levels of secreted Aβ40 and Aβ42, compared with those derived from the parental line, but these effects were not as extreme as those seen in isogenic SORL1-knockout iPSC-derived neurons. Treatment of cells expressing E270K with a small molecule that stabilizes retromer restored endosome size and reduced levels of Aβ. It should be noted that the parental cell line is homozygous for three SNPs (rs668387, rs689021, and rs641120) in linkage disequilibrium within intron 6 of SORL1—a haplotype reported to associate with an increased risk of AD (Rogaeva et al., 2007)—and that the APOE genotype is E3/E4 (Young et al., 2015; Knupp et al., 2020).

The variant was predicted to be disease-causing by Mutation Taster, probably damaging by PolyPhen-2, damaging by SIFT, and neutral by PROVEAN (El Bitar et al., 2019).

Table

Risk Allele(s) N
Cases (families)|
Controls
aAllele frequency
Cases | Controls
Reported association measurements Ancestry
(Cohort)
Reference
Large-scale studies, meta- and mega-analyses
A 9204 | 9646 1.9×10-2 | 1.7×10-2 Fixed effect model
OR = 1.04
[CI: 0.89 – 1.21]
p = 0.621
Random effects model
OR = 1.04
[CI: 0.89 – 1.22]
p = 0.598
European, European American Campion et al., 2019

early onset AD
3180 | 8970

1.4×10-2 | 1.8×10-2 Fixed effect model
OR = 0.87
[CI: 0.68 – 1.12]
p = 0.271
Random effects model
OR = 0.88
[CI: 0.69 – 1.14]
p = 0.336
European, European American
A 15,808 | 16,097 2.1×10-2 | 2.0×10-2 OR = 0.99
[CI: 0.89 – 1.12]
p = 0.92
Multiple European and American cohorts Holstege et al., 2022
(mega-analysis)
18,959 | 21,893   OR = 1.02
[CI: 0.92 – 1.13]
p = 0.68
A 18,959 | 21,893   OR = 1.02
[CI: 0.92 – 1.13]
p = 0.68
bMultiple European and American cohorts Holstege et al., 2023
early onset AD
6,154 | 21,893
  OR = 0.94
[CI: 0.81 – 1.1]
p = 0.45
late-onset AD
12,805 | 21,893
  OR = 1.1
[CI: 0.95 – 1.2]
p = 0.29
A 1255 | 1938 2×10-2 | 3×10-2 OR = 0.75
[CI: 0.51 – 1.12]
p = 0.17
European
(European Early-Onset Dementia Consortium)
Verheijen et al., 2016
Other studies
A 117 | N.A. 5.1×10-2 | N.A   Saudi Arabian
(King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center)
El Bitar et al., 2019
A sporadic EOAD
217 | 169
3.19×10-2 | 9.4×10-3 OR = 3.462
[CI: N.A.]
p = 0.043
European American
(Knight ADRC)
Fernández et al., 2016
A 640 | 1268 1.3×10-2 | 1.8×10-2   Dutch
(Rotterdam Study, Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, Alzheimer Centrum Zuidwest Nederland (ACZN), 100-plus Study)
Holstege et al., 2017
A 332 | 676 4.8×10-2 | 2.6×10-2 OR = 1.849
[CI: 0.869 – 3.90]
p = 1
UK and North American Caucasian
(NIH-UCL, Knight ADRC, ADNI, Cache County Study on Memory in Aging)
Sassi et al., 2016
A 462 (87) |  498 1.17×10-2 | 1.00×10-2 cp = 7.68×10-7 Caribbean Hispanic (family- and cohort-based) Vardarajan et al., 2015
A 211 | N.A. 3.3×10-2 | N.A.   North European Vardarajan et al., 2015

aAllele frequencies as reported by study authors or calculated by Alzforum curators from data provided in the study, assuming heterozygosity if not explicitly stated in the paper.
bAddtional subjects added to the dataset reported by Holstege et al., 2022.
cLinkage and association analysis with PSEUDOMARKER20 using all family members and unrelated controls.

This table is meant to convey the range of results reported in the literature. As specific analyses, including co-variates, differ among studies, this information is not intended to be used for quantitative comparisons, and readers are encouraged to refer to the original papers. Thresholds for statistical significance were defined by the authors of each study. (Significant results are in bold.) Note that data from some cohorts may have contributed to multiple studies, so each row does not necessarily represent an independent dataset. While every effort was made to be accurate, readers should confirm any values that are critical for their applications.

Last Updated: 18 Jul 2024

Comments

No Available Comments

Make a Comment

To make a comment you must login or register.

References

Paper Citations

  1. . SORL1 variants across Alzheimer's disease European American cohorts. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Dec;24(12):1828-1830. Epub 2016 Sep 21 PubMed.
  2. . Influence of Coding Variability in APP-Aβ Metabolism Genes in Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0150079. Epub 2016 Jun 1 PubMed.
  3. . SORL1 Variants in Familial Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(4):1275-1281. PubMed.
  4. . A comprehensive study of the genetic impact of rare variants in SORL1 in European early-onset Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Aug;132(2):213-24. Epub 2016 Mar 30 PubMed.
  5. . Genetic Study of Alzheimer's Disease in Saudi Population. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67(1):231-242. PubMed.
  6. . Coding mutations in SORL1 and Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2015 Feb;77(2):215-27. PubMed.
  7. . SORL1 genetic variants and Alzheimer disease risk: a literature review and meta-analysis of sequencing data. Acta Neuropathol. 2019 Aug;138(2):173-186. Epub 2019 Mar 25 PubMed.
  8. . Exome sequencing identifies rare damaging variants in ATP8B4 and ABCA1 as risk factors for Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet. 2022 Dec;54(12):1786-1794. Epub 2022 Nov 21 PubMed.
  9. . Effect of prioritized SORL1 missense variants supports clinical consideration for familial Alzheimer's Disease. 2023 Jul 16 10.1101/2023.07.13.23292622 (version 1) medRxiv.
  10. . Characterization of pathogenic SORL1 genetic variants for association with Alzheimer's disease: a clinical interpretation strategy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Aug;25(8):973-981. Epub 2017 May 24 PubMed.
  11. . Pharmacologic Stabilization of Retromer Rescues Endosomal Pathology Induced by Defects in the Alzheimer's gene SORL1. 2022 Sep 26 10.1101/2022.07.31.502217 (version 2) bioRxiv.
  12. . The neuronal sortilin-related receptor SORL1 is genetically associated with Alzheimer disease. Nat Genet. 2007 Feb;39(2):168-77. PubMed.
  13. . Elucidating molecular phenotypes caused by the SORL1 Alzheimer's disease genetic risk factor using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2015 Apr 2;16(4):373-85. Epub 2015 Mar 12 PubMed.
  14. . Depletion of the AD Risk Gene SORL1 Selectively Impairs Neuronal Endosomal Traffic Independent of Amyloidogenic APP Processing. Cell Rep. 2020 Jun 2;31(9):107719. PubMed.

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading

Protein Diagram

Primary Papers

  1. . Coding mutations in SORL1 and Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2015 Feb;77(2):215-27. PubMed.

Disclaimer: Alzforum does not provide medical advice. The Content is for informational, educational, research and reference purposes only and is not intended to substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek advice from a qualified physician or health care professional about any medical concern, and do not disregard professional medical advice because of anything you may read on Alzforum.